Welwyn Garden City V

That first win of the season remained elusive for Reed’s Fourth XI when they once again had their opposition 9 wickets down at the conclusion. Batting first on an artificial wicket in Welwyn Garden City, Reed’s young opening pair of George Garrott and Will Heslam quickly posted a half-century stand in only 7 overs with some rasping shots to the boundary. Heslam was unfortunate to pick-out the backward square leg fielder with a cleanly hit pull that just carried enough and he departed for 21. Garrott continued to reach 46 which included nine boundaries. Richard Robertson came and went thus leaving Josh Conley and John Kershaw together with the score on 90 for 3 after 17 overs. Conley played his usual role by hitting balls in his arc to the boundary and he too scored 21. John Heslam made 16 by the time he was caught at the wicket which brought in the captain, Peter Baker, at number 7 when the score was 174 for 5 with just 10 overs left. Kershaw had passed his second successive fifty and he and Baker then accelerated. They completed an unbroken alliance of 83 for the 6th wicket as the innings concluded at 257 for 5. Baker was 28 not out, but outstandingly John Kershaw notched-up an undefeated 101 in the last over.With an array of bowlers packed in the Reed team, Christian Martin and Chris West opened the bowling. West picked-up 2 for 34 before he was replaced by young leg-spinner Rhoddri Hughes. Ian Roberts was brought on in place of Martin and in an economical spell of 8 overs took 1 for 16. Meanwhile Hughes, assisted by some excellent catching by the fielders and glove work [...]

By |2016-12-27T13:24:01+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Welwyn Garden City V

West Herts III

The Thirds finished the season with a subdued performance against relegation candidates West Herts III. Having secured promotion the previous week the goal was to finish as runners up. Winning the toss, Maseeh Naeem asked the visitors to bat first. In the absence of three key bowlers, Louis Fitzgerald and George Garrott lead the Reed attack. Both bowlers bowled well enough to give catching chances early in the innings. With only 21 on the board, the Reed fielders managed to drop both opening bats allowing West Herts to reach 87 without loss. The unlucky Fitzgerald and Garrott were replaced by Chris West (6-0-0-37) and James Hooper (7-0-2-27); it was Hooper that got the break through bowling both openers. West Herts batted stubbornly and their score steadily increased. Not for the first time this season the introduction of spinner Matthew Naeem (10-2-2-34) allowed Reed to buy some wickets, bowling in tandem with skipper Maseeh Naeem (9-1-3-30), the passage of play saw 5 wickets fall. Fitzgerald (10-1-0-44) and Garrott (8-1-1-32) returned in an attempt to end the West Herts innings with only Garrott managing to pick up a wicket. Reeds fielding performance was poor, 5 dropped catches allowed the visitors to post a score of 218 for 8 declared after 50 overs, probably 50 runs more than they should have been allowed.Reed’s reply started badly, openers Aiden swain (2) was given out LBW with the score on 14 and Paul Garrott (9) was bowled without the score board moving. The Thirds highest run scorer Ian Fulk arrival at the crease brought some hope to the innings but the loss of two partners in quick succession left Reed on 21 for 4. Steve Lovegrove joined Fulk and the [...]

By |2014-01-12T14:39:02+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on West Herts III

Welwyn Garden City IV

Reed opened the season away to a side who narrowly missed out on promotion the previous season. With a weakened batting line up the plan was to bowl first and restrict their hosts. This they did to a degree Woolley only offering resistance scoring a near chanceless century, with the next highest score 19 and only two other players reaching double figures. Julien Fynn picking up 4 wickets, R Martin 2. The total of 200 to win was probably 50 higher than Reed had hoped for.Reed made a steady start losing G Garrott run out when the score was on 48. This brought bowler of the day Fynn to the wicket and with Lovegrove began to take hold of WGC's bowlers. Lovegrove fell for 58 but Fynn 88 no and Scott Caine 23no continued in a similar vein to see Reed home by 7 wickets with 7 over's remaining.

By |2014-01-12T14:39:02+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Welwyn Garden City IV

Watford Town III

Reed IVs dropped lower in the Division as a result of their poor showing in the match against Watford Town on Saturday. A contentious umpiring decision that went in favour of Watford’s opening batsman who went on to make 76 did not help Reed’s cause but after that the fielders did not support the bowlers and spilled 5 catches as Watford compiled 243 for 5 at the declaration after 45 overs. Christian Martin found some form by taking 3 for 40. Young leg-break bowler, Rhoddri Hughes, snared the other 2 wickets to fall. Cemal Ramadan fielded brilliantly and must have saved an estimated 25 runs in the outfield by his committed chasing, retrieving and throwing.Needing a solid start, the worst happened as skipper, Peter Baker, drilled a long-hop towards the bowler’s head in the second over of Reed’s innings and he managed to cling-on to the catch. Richard Robertson, (14), stayed for a while but everyone else apart from young Ramadan failed to pass 7. Cemal simply had fearless fun and scored 40 out of Reed’s final total of 74. After a defeat to Hatfield Hyde, an abandoned match and this loss to Watford Town, Reed IVs have notched-up only 15 points in the last three matches. Midway through the season, they now need to start putting some consistently good performances together to re-establish their standing if they hope to contest a promotion spot. Reed IV 0 points; Watford Town III 30 points.

By |2016-12-27T13:24:02+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Watford Town III

Shenley Village IV

Reed decided to bat first after winning the toss but inexplicably were soon in trouble at 27 for 4. Step forward two of the promising youngsters from Reed’s Colts’ structure. Calmly, Dominick McOmish, (26), and Jack Caine, (17), added another 47 for the 5th wicket with some well-timed boundaries. The scoring rate was never a problem although wickets tumbled regularly thereafter. Richard Robertson scored 20 and Reece Fitzgerald 15, and with some further resistance from the rest of the lower order, Reed were all-out for just 125 in only 24 overs. This meant that Shenley Village had a total of 66 overs in which to achieve their required target at fewer than 2 runs per over.Tea was taken after the first fifteen-over session. At this point, the hosts were already 4 wickets down. Veteran campaigners, Ian Roberts and Richard Robertson, had opened the bowling attack for Reed and once in their stride had made life difficult for the batsmen. Robertson took 3 for 40 before being replaced by 13-year-old Reece Fitzgerald whose stature as an off-spin bowler has grown match-by-match this season. Ian Roberts continued and settled into a long spell of 16 overs eventually ending with an economical 2 for 25 as he mesmerised the batsmen with his trademark full-length out-swingers.Fitzgerald meanwhile flighted his deliveries and varied his pace trapping 2 batters early-on in his spell. Warren Seeley batting at number 4 saw his team-mates come and go and virtually played a lone hand although Woodward stayed with him for a period that looked as if they might see Shenley home to victory. Alan Ward took-over from the tiring Roberts and conceded only 11 runs from 7 overs, but it was young Fitzgerald who [...]

By |2016-12-27T13:24:04+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Shenley Village IV

Waltham X Rosedale IV

When Chris Marshall and George Garrott ripped through the Rosedale top-order batting taking 3 wickets a-piece, it was only a matter of time before Reed achieved victory. Because of bowling restrictions on young pace bowlers, Under 15 colt Marshall had figures of 3 for 22 from 6 overs and Garrott, 3 for 14 in his 7 over spell before they both had to be replaced. Reeling with 6 wickets down only the opening batsman, Colin Winter, got into double figures for the hosts as he top-scored with 43 before he became the second of Reece Fitzgerald's three scalps. Change bowlers Ian Roberts took 1 for 17 from 9 overs, and Fitzgerald, (from Reed's Under 13s squad), returned figures of 3 for 21 from his 9 overs of off-spin.Earlier, Reed's innings had faltered at 24 for 2 but George Garrott, (31), then added 94 in partnership with Dominick McOmish, (41), in a display of finely-placed and sweetly-timed shots. Alan Ward scored 37 whilst some lusty hitting was produced by Rob Willoughby, (17), and Ian Roberts, (16 n.o.), enabling Reed to close on a strong 216 for 7.The rout ended with Rosedale all-out for 88 some 128 short of their target as wicket keeper Ian Curtis and fielders Swain, Baker and Fitzgerald supported the bowlers by taking some excellent catches. Reed have now improved 5 positions in their Division in the past 2 weeks and have clambered away from the relegation zone with four matches to play.

By |2014-01-12T14:39:02+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Waltham X Rosedale IV

Rickmansworth IV

On the Second ground at Rickmansworth which was full of weeds with stones scattered on parts of the outfield, Reed’s openers set-off in watchful fashion. The pitch had been dampened and each delivery was unpredictable, but Peter Baker and Paul Garrott were solid enough until Baker mis-judged the capabilities of the mid-on fielder and was run-out for 13 with the score on 18. Enter Richard Robertson who accompanied Garrott until both had passed their half-centuries. Robertson in particular applied excellent footwork in straight driving the bowlers. The partnership had added 117 when Robertson was bowled for 51. Rob Willoughby began in belligerent mood by cracking successive boundaries through and over the on-side. Paul Garrott eventually fell for a more than competent 88 but Willoughby continued in hard-hitting form and pressed on to 71 not out when the innings closed on 258 for 4.Christian Martin was soon amongst the wickets when Rickmansworth batted and his spell of 10 overs provided him with 3 for 21. Spinner Nick Green flighted his deliveries well to take 1 for 21 and Alan Ward took 1 for 9, but chief wicket-taker was Ian Roberts who returned 4 for 31. Frustratingly for Reed however, the number 11 held-out for the last 3 overs thus earning the draw, although 134 runs behind at the end. Match Drawn. Reed IV 19 points; Rickmansworth IV 1 point.

By |2016-12-27T13:24:05+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Rickmansworth IV

Sandridge II

18 points was the result of the away fixture to relegation candidates Sandridge II. The home side were desperate for points and after winning the toss the Sandridge Skipper asked Reed to bat. Paul Garrott (11) and Ben Bowles (26) had to concentrate on a pitch that had unpredictable bounce. The Sandridge opening bowlers bowled sensible making the Reed batsman work for their runs. Garrott was the first victim of the pitch, bowled by a ball that kept really low with the Reed score on 29. Bowles and Ian Fulk took the score to 55 before Bowles was caught at slip, two more quick wickets fell and Reed appeared to be in some difficulties at 80 for 4. Steve Lovegrove started to repair the innings, firstly with Fulk (24), before Fulk too fell victim to a ball that stayed low and then with Nick Green. Lovegrove was eventually out 5 runs short of his half century, but his innings had given Reed a total that they could realistically defend. Green continued to bat with some maturity ensuring Reed past the 200 mark and gain maximum batting points. He finished 43 not out and Reed ended on 204 for 9 after 53 overs.The Sandridge reply did not start well; Louis Fitzgerald striking in his first over by removing Sheperd, for a duck. After that there was little success for the Reed openers, Matt Giblin was very economical his 8 overs only conceding 16 runs, but he was unable to pick up a wicket. George Garrott replaced Giblin and he too bowled a good line and length with no reward. By now the Sandridge second wicket partnership had put on 73 runs, with Darab (56) in particular [...]

By |2016-12-27T13:24:06+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Sandridge II

Old Elizabethans III

Paul Garrott’s amazing run-gathering continued on Saturday as he remained undefeated on 74 not out when the Reed innings closed at 184 for 4. This was his third successive half-century in the three league matches played so far. Alan Ward, (16 n.o.), is yet to be dismissed this season and after useful contributions from Ben Bowles, (22), and the double six-hitting Josh Conley, (19), Reed once again achieved maximum batting points.However, what was quite an uneven and, at time, dangerous pitch early-on, appeared to have smoothed-out for the Old Elizabethans’ reply. Reed were able to take only 3 wickets, (2 of them by Richard Robertson), as they went down by 7 wickets with 3 overs to spare.

By |2016-12-27T13:24:08+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Old Elizabethans III

Radlett V

Match report to followaHaving won the toss the Reed Captain decided to bowl; Julian Fynn (14-5-2-21) and Kallum Ward (11-3-3-22) opened the bowling and made it very difficult for the Radlett openers to score and the run rate was painfully slow. Ward was the first to strike bowling Shah for 10 in his first spell before being replaced by Nick Green who returned figures of 6-0-1-24. The absence of two key, bowlers away on holiday meant Reed had to rotate the bowling. The reliable Fynn was rested after a long spell and replaced by Richard Barlow who bowled a very tidy 5 overs, picking up 1-10. The introduction of leg spinner Matthew Naeem to the bowling attack ensured Radlett were never going to post a high score. Naeem bowled a spell of 15.5 overs, picking up 3 wickets for 31 runs. Ward and Fynn returned for their second spells and finished of the last of Radlett’s resistance and the hosts were all out for 119 after 51.5 overs.In reply Paul Garrott and Richard Barlow opened the batting and patiently built a partnership of 76 before Barlow was bowled on 38. Julian Fynn (18 no) went in at three and with Garrott, who finished on 49 not out, saw Reed reach their target in 32.4 overs.Today’s comfortable 9 wicket win made it three wins in a row for the thirds and kept them in second place and with 9 games to play, a good chance of promotion.

By |2016-12-27T13:24:09+00:00August 21st, 2013|Categories: 2011 Match Report|Tags: |Comments Off on Radlett V
Go to Top